A skill is an organized ability, it’s composed of one o more components, and
these components can be sensorimotor actions, representations, or abstractions.
In using a skill, a person controls sources of variation. These sources are
determined jointly by the person’s actions and the environment. Because of this
reason, skills must be relatively specific. Environment dictates that children
master particular skills. This theory of skill is different from a Piagetian
scheme which assumed to have a high degree of generality resulting from a
structure d’ ensemble. It characterizes a person as being at a particular
developmental stage, and a skill as at a particular level.
Changes in the environmental context of skills produce changes in the skills, and therefore skills in different domains seldom show precise synchrony in developmental level.
Changes in the environmental context of skills produce changes in the skills, and therefore skills in different domains seldom show precise synchrony in developmental level.
Different
people show behaviors that look the same but involve different skills. Behavior
is ambiguous. The “same” act can be carried out via a number of different
strategies and therefore via different skills. These different skills involve
different developmental levels.
A
straightforward rule proves to be useful in moving beyond the ambiguity of
behavior, find the simplest possible skill that could produce a particular behavior,
where the investigator designs the simplest task for testing each step in a
predicted developmental sequence. This assumption will allow us to predict
earliest possible level at which that behavior can appear.
Different
skill will be at different levels in the same child at the same time. Even if
analysis is limited to one area, such as language, children will not show the
same level of performance across skills. Skill theory explains these shifts
trough the construct of optimal level.
The child
has an upper limit to her abilities – a highest level beyond which she cannot
go. Consequently the skills that she practices frequently will be at this
highest level, but other skills will not. Optimal level increases with age, and
the population of language. The increase in optimal level does not seem to be
constant, however: it seems to show cyclical periods of relatively faster
change and slower change and so in sense. These changes in speed mean that
children at a given level should be able to master more complex steps within
level but should have difficulty even the simplest step at the next level.
Optimal
level thus accounts for the broad course of development in al skills, including
language skills. There are ten levels which a person develops from infancy to
adulthood. They increase in difficult and complexity. The existence of these
levels has been supported by other investigators for the period of infancy.
The
progression of skills show a repetitive cycle suck that the structures of
levels. Each of the cycles, called a tier. Specifies skills of different types.
But the four levels have similar structures. Levels 1, 4, and 7 involve single
units. At levels 2, 5, and 8, the characteristic structure is a mapping, in
which variations in one component are systematically related to variation in a
second.
In this
system, the ability to relate several distinct aspects of each component allows
the child to understand complex relations between the components. Levels 4. 7.
And 10 are the culmination of development within each tier.
However major statistical shifts in population of skills do occur, both within and across children.
However major statistical shifts in population of skills do occur, both within and across children.
Skill
theory explains these shifts through the construct of optimal level.
Optimal
level increase with age, of course, and the population of language skills
gradually shifts upward in a statistical fashion as the child develops a higher
optimal level.
The ten
developmental levels described by skill theory.
Sensorimotor
-Single
sensorimotor action.
-Sensorimotor mapping
-Sensorimotor system
-Sensorimotor mapping
-Sensorimotor system
Representational
- System of
sensorimotor systems
- Representational mapping
- Representational system
- System of representational systems
- Representational mapping
- Representational system
- System of representational systems
Abstract
- Abstract mapping
- Abstract system
-System of abstract system.
- Abstract mapping
- Abstract system
-System of abstract system.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario